<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Amazon BookSurge Antitrust Lawsuit Clearinghouse &#187; filings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antitrust.booklocker.com/category/filings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antitrust.booklocker.com</link>
	<description>Information and updates on the Amazon BookSurge antitrust lawsuit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Amazon / Booksurge Antitrust Hearing Recap</title>
		<link>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-booksurge-antitrust-hearing-recap</link>
		<comments>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-booksurge-antitrust-hearing-recap#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antitrust.booklocker.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 9th, BookLocker.com and Amazon / BookSurge were in Federal court in Bangor, Maine. BookLocker subsequently filed an amended complaint to clarify some points raised by the judge.
That amended complaint is here:
http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amended-complaint.pdf
Amazon / BookSurge has until March 20th to respond.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-booksurge-antitrust-hearing-recap/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon / Booksurge File Motion To Dismiss, BookLocker Responds</title>
		<link>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/july-31-2008-booklockercom-vs-amazoncom-anti-trust-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/july-31-2008-booklockercom-vs-amazoncom-anti-trust-lawsuit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antitrust.booklocker.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, Amazon filed a motion to dismiss our lawsuit last month. BookLocker today filed its response.
1. BookLocker&#8217;s original complaint is HERE.
2. Amazon&#8217;s motion is HERE.
3. BookLocker&#8217;s response is HERE.
We&#8217;d love to hear your COMMENTS! Please post them RIGHT HERE.
The wheels of justice tend to turn very slowly. We&#8217;ll keep you updated as the case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/july-31-2008-booklockercom-vs-amazoncom-anti-trust-lawsuit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update On Status Of Amazon Antitrust Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/update-on-status-of-amazon-antitrust-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/update-on-status-of-amazon-antitrust-lawsuit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antitrust.booklocker.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick update about the status of the lawsuit.  Amazon has retained Gibson, Dunn &#38; Crutcher, LLP as their law firm.  Under the current scheduling order entered by the court, Amazon will be filing a motion to dismiss the case by June 30th. A motion to dismiss is basically Amazon&#8217;s legal argument as to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/update-on-status-of-amazon-antitrust-lawsuit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Served</title>
		<link>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-served</link>
		<comments>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-served#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-served</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just got confirmation that Amazon was served on May 21st. If they 
didn't know about the suit before, they sure do now.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/amazon-served/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BookLocker Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Amazon.com</title>
		<link>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/booklocker-files-class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon</link>
		<comments>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/booklocker-files-class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antitrust.booklocker.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BookLocker.com has filed a class action lawsuit against Amazon.com in response to Amazon&#8217;s recent attempts to force all publishers using Print on Demand (POD) technology to pay Amazon to print their books. You can read the complaint here.
This article may be quoted and/or reprinted in its entirety.  
BookLocker.com has filed a class action lawsuit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antitrust.booklocker.com/booklocker-files-class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
